What is Web 2.0?
Officially, web 2.0 is the perceived second generation of web development that aims to facilitate communication, information sharing, interoperability, and collaboration. Web 2.0 concepts have led to the development and evolution of web-based communities, hosted services, and applications; such as social-networking sites, video-sharing sites, wikis, blogs, and folksonomies like Digg and Delicious.
As a web designer, I find that I am constantly barraged with clients asking for a web 2.0 look. Sometimes after designing beautifully complex and graphically innovative website concepts, I get the response, "make it more web 2.0". This is upsetting to say the least. Web 2.0 was, is and always will be functionality; a turn in technology - not design. Web 3.0 won't be the next design trend or layout fad. It will be the next level of usability, functionality, and technology on the internet.
At first I tried to fight this misconception by clarifying the meaning of web 2.0 to clients and designers alike. After many frustrating conversations, I found that I was fighting a losing battle. Apparently when clients want "web 2.0", they want the current design fad seen on many designer's portfolios today. This design fad is centered, fixed, uses large text, minimal design, uses large amounts of negative space and usually has equal, centrally oriented columns. This design trend has become so commonplace that it has been mistakenly coined "web 2.0" to the design laymen. And it seems that talentless web designers are more than happy to accommodate this unreality.
Don't get me wrong - this is an actual style that can be used to great effect in many cases. In most cases, however, it is copied, templated and used over and over in the web design world to recycle the same old look, again and again, client after client. With good branding, a "web 2.0" styled website can be very effective. Twitter is a good example of this - it has both actual web 2.0 functionality as well as the supposed web 2.0 style. Simplicity at its best. Unfortunately, when a data and information driven website wants to be "web 2.0" it doesn't work well. They end up with template-like sites that have very little in the way of design, and just end up looking like information soup, with a bold looking logo slapped on the top. Not very effective.
I'm not a "web 2.0" designer. Not at heart, at least. I find it difficult to reign myself in enough to showcase a minimalist design. The websites I have designed for The SEO Authority and Beautiful 2.0 are about as close to this style as I have dared to go. While many of my other websites have "web 2.0" style qualities, I tend to showcase "the pixel" more often than not. But, like anything in the design world, it is subjective and relative. Even this website could be called web 2.0 given the right (or wrong) perspective.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And unfortunately, the beholder is more often than not in love with overused template websites that were designed with little to no creativity. The old story about the bridge comes to mind - and everyone seems to be jumping.
As a web designer, I find that I am constantly barraged with clients asking for a web 2.0 look. Sometimes after designing beautifully complex and graphically innovative website concepts, I get the response, "make it more web 2.0". This is upsetting to say the least. Web 2.0 was, is and always will be functionality; a turn in technology - not design. Web 3.0 won't be the next design trend or layout fad. It will be the next level of usability, functionality, and technology on the internet.
At first I tried to fight this misconception by clarifying the meaning of web 2.0 to clients and designers alike. After many frustrating conversations, I found that I was fighting a losing battle. Apparently when clients want "web 2.0", they want the current design fad seen on many designer's portfolios today. This design fad is centered, fixed, uses large text, minimal design, uses large amounts of negative space and usually has equal, centrally oriented columns. This design trend has become so commonplace that it has been mistakenly coined "web 2.0" to the design laymen. And it seems that talentless web designers are more than happy to accommodate this unreality.
Don't get me wrong - this is an actual style that can be used to great effect in many cases. In most cases, however, it is copied, templated and used over and over in the web design world to recycle the same old look, again and again, client after client. With good branding, a "web 2.0" styled website can be very effective. Twitter is a good example of this - it has both actual web 2.0 functionality as well as the supposed web 2.0 style. Simplicity at its best. Unfortunately, when a data and information driven website wants to be "web 2.0" it doesn't work well. They end up with template-like sites that have very little in the way of design, and just end up looking like information soup, with a bold looking logo slapped on the top. Not very effective.
I'm not a "web 2.0" designer. Not at heart, at least. I find it difficult to reign myself in enough to showcase a minimalist design. The websites I have designed for The SEO Authority and Beautiful 2.0 are about as close to this style as I have dared to go. While many of my other websites have "web 2.0" style qualities, I tend to showcase "the pixel" more often than not. But, like anything in the design world, it is subjective and relative. Even this website could be called web 2.0 given the right (or wrong) perspective.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And unfortunately, the beholder is more often than not in love with overused template websites that were designed with little to no creativity. The old story about the bridge comes to mind - and everyone seems to be jumping.
Labels: blogging
posted by Christopher Nelson at
5:40 AM
6 Comments:
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Ann
http://largepet.info
Wow - thanks for the comment! I do try to be somewhat entertaining :)
And about your blog - I've been thinking about getting a Maine-Coon for a long time!
I love your humor. Thanks for clarifying web 2.0 - I actually didn't know what it was at all before I read this... and now I do.
Well, I've pretty much given in to the whole "web 2.0 look" thing. It's not accurate or correct, but it's quickly becoming a universal design term and so I'm forced to bow to society. I'm not saying I'm jumping off the bridge... maybe I'm just there at the edge, wishing people luck before they jump to their inevitable ending as chunky salsa. :)
Chunky salsa... ha ha ha...
Its good and very informative.
Thanks
Post a Comment
<< Back To Blog Home